3D Prostate Mapping Biopsy (3D-PMB)
The
knowledge of the extent and grade of a patient's prostate
tumor is critical to choosing the proper course of treatment.
Unfortunately, imaging with MRI or Color Doppler ultrasound
is not sensitive or specific enough to make the critical
decisions needed concerning an individual's prostate cancer
management. To compound the problem, Trans-rectal Ultrasound
Guided Biopsy (TRUS) prostate biopsy is also a woefully
inadequate diagnostic and staging procedure. Dr. Onik's
work recently presented at the Society of Interventional
Radiology annual meeting (2009) in San Diego showed that
with TRUS biopsy alone 70% of prostate cancer patients are
inappropriately treated.
In
order to solve this dilemma Dr. Onik has developed what
he is calling a 3D Prostate Mapping Biopsy (3D-PMB). This
prosate biopsy is different than the TRUS biopsy in a number
of ways. Firstly, it is carried out through the skin of
the perineum (area behind the scrotum and in front of the
rectum) so the procedure is sterile and a larger number
of prostate biopsy samples can safely be taken. Secondly,
the prostate is biopsied every 5 millimeters throughout
it's whole volume. The number of core samples taken is therefore
dependent on the size of a patient's prostate as opposed
to a arbitrary number as in TRUS biopsy. The prostate biopsies
are guided using a brachytherapy grid (similar to playing
battleship) and the specimens are sent labeled as to it's
exact location. If a biopsy therefore comes back positive,
the cancer's exact location in the prostate is now known
so it can later be targeted for treatment. Lastly, the procedure
is always carried out under heavy sedation or general anesthesia.
The
results we have obtained using this prostate biopsy method
have changed our thinking about the staging of prostate
cancer. We have found that 50% of the patients that were
thought to have only one sided cancer by TRUS biopsy actually
have cancer on both sides of the gland. In addition, 25%
of the patients biopsied have an increase in their Gleason
score after a 3D-PMB. Many of the patient's that we see
that are considering "watchful waiting" find out
that in actuality they are NOT good candidates for that
management strategy.
The
complications associated with 3D-PMB have been minor and
self limited. We feel that the information gained from the
biopsy is far outweighed by any additional risk the biopsy
poses. The overwhelming majority of patients therefore need
a 3D-PMB prior to choosing therapy.
|